Rabbilo.com
The New Internet
Home
Login

|

Register
close

Available Content:

    Talk
    Posts
    Articles
    Members

    Sponsored Ad

    Maurice

    27
    User Avatar
    Talk
    Posts
    Articles
    Join the Talk!
    Donald Trump
    5d ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Mayra
    Hello Mayra! I understand you feel that way, likely because the media you follow suggested for weeks that Harris would win. But if you looked closer at the polls, many showed Trump performing better than in 2016 and 2020, with final polls even showing him ahead nationally.
    0
    1
    1
    4
    1
    7
    US Elections
    6d ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Brianna
    Both parties have taken steps to guard against fraud and manipulation, so the results seem legitimate; otherwise, Democrats, from the highest positions down the ticket, would likely have contested their defeats.
    0
    1
    1
    3
    5
    10
    US Elections
    6d ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Brianna
    The lower voter turnout raises questions. Some on the right argue that the 2020 election saw an unprecedented surge, which they claim might indicate fraud. However, voter turnout often depends on enthusiasm. If voters weren’t particularly excited about Harris or Trump, turnout could naturally drop.
    1
    1
    2
    6
    3
    13
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to TheReporter
    Sorry, Daniel, but I’d say it’s got to be at least 5x that number! With 140,551,871 votes cast, it’s likely that at least as many people followed election night online or on TV in some way.
    1
    1
    1
    3
    4
    10
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    Imagine a soccer team where half the players hate the other half; how could they ever win? The Dems could’ve just said, 'We disagree with Trump,' without the name-calling, like the 'Hitler' comparisons or Hillary's 'basket of deplorables.' That alienated half the country.
    0
    1
    1
    2
    5
    9
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    You made some excellent points, but I think the last one may be influenced by the media you're consuming. No one has faced more relentless attacks than Trump, especially with all the Hitler nonsense, for a guy who literally brokered peace deals. It's terrible from both sides, these endless attacks.
    0
    1
    1
    2
    3
    7
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    Republican-led states often outperform Democrat-led ones. I respect your support for Harris, truly. But there’s no convincing me otherwise: key issues like Harris herself, the woke agenda, open-door policies on illegal immigration, and attempts to limit free speech are absolute no-gos for me.
    0
    0
    2
    2
    4
    8
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    I assume you’re not a fan of someone like Musk, but given his unmatched success as a multi-entrepreneur, him joining a Trump administration could be exactly what’s needed!
    0
    1
    1
    2
    2
    6
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    US economy looks strong with low unemployment and solid GDP growth, but inflation and trade deficits show there's more beneath the surface. We aren’t doing much better than others—we aren’t. Economic health is complex, and spending must be cut, which won’t happen under Harris
    0
    2
    0
    4
    2
    8
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    I’d much prefer having an entrepreneur or businessperson at the helm.
    0
    2
    0
    3
    2
    7
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    Again, I agree with you. But from what I’ve read—and I admit I may not be fully informed, the unrealized capital gains tax proposed by Harris seems toxic. Plus, I just don’t feel comfortable with a president who has never run any kind of business themselves.
    0
    0
    1
    4
    1
    6
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    Yes, I fully agree with you on that! But the point is more about not outsourcing everything. It’s essential to keep some production capabilities to remain more independent. We need a plan for what we can produce, where to invest, and how to become a manufacturing nation again.
    0
    0
    1
    4
    1
    6
    US Elections
    1w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to GB_MUC
    Firstly: Welcome! Tariffs may raise prices, but they’re meant to bring jobs back home. Billionaires pay a large share of income taxes, but should their wealth be taxed more or invested for growth? Meanwhile, the government urgently needs to stop its insane spending before we collapse!
    0
    2
    0
    3
    1
    6
    US Elections
    2w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    The betting favorite has only lost twice since 1866. The only time, other than in 2016, that bettors have missed was in in 1948, when Harry Truman (D) beat eight-to-one odds to defeat Thomas Dewey (R).
    0
    1
    1
    5
    1
    8
    US Elections
    2w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    So many recent polls suggest Trump is either in front, it’s a tie, or Harris has a slight lead. But it all comes down to voter turnout. Whichever party can mobilize their voters most, securing PA likely means a Trump win, and holding strong in the Rust Belt points to Harris.

    Shared link: 270towin.com/...

    5
    11
    7
    23
    16
    62
    US Elections
    4w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    When you look at the positive posts about Harris on X, you’ll often find entire channels seemingly dedicated to promoting her. And objectively speaking, there's just not the level of enthusiasm they claim is there. It’s clear they picked the wrong candidate.
    2
    3
    1
    10
    5
    21
    US Elections
    5w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Vote
    Firstly, you can vote for whoever you like—even if that’s Harris. But facts are facts. If there aren’t sufficient measures against illegal immigration, and it actually ends up benefiting more than it prevents, you’re heading for trouble.
    1
    2
    1
    3
    5
    12
    US Elections
    5w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Vote
    It’s hard to get all the facts, but it’s clear they’re making it easy for illegal immigrants to access housing and funding—essentially a form of 'letting them in.' This is the opposite of what other countries do to discourage illegal immigration.
    1
    1
    1
    7
    5
    15
    US Elections
    5w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Vote
    That's actually the most incorrect statement you’ve made so far. Illegal crossings have hit record levels under Biden/Harris. The intent is clear: they aim to grant citizenship to these individuals, ensuring Democratic votes and securing the presidency for decades.

    Shared link: economist.com/...

    0
    2
    2
    10
    9
    23
    US Elections
    5w ago Maurice
    27
    User avatar
    Reply to Vote
    Biden and Harris have let in double-digit numbers of immigrants, putting strain on the system. They also want to limit the First Amendment and support the military-industrial complex, pushing for ongoing wars instead of peace talks. It’s practically impossible to vote blue with all of this.
    3
    1
    0
    8
    12
    24
    • Strongly Agree (Great) Rating icon
    • Agree (Good) Rating icon
    • Neutral Rating icon
    • Disagree (Bad) Rating icon
    • Strongly Disagree (Terrible) Rating icon
    From 1 to 20 out of 29
    About Rabbilo Contact FAQ