Major insights from the vice presidential debate between Walz and Vance

Sponsored Ad

In a highly anticipated debate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Ohio Senator JD Vance, the vice-presidential candidates for the 2024 election, took to the stage in New York. This marks one of the last major debates before Election Day on November 5, as the presidential race tightens. The debate, moderated by CBS News, was overshadowed by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, where Iran launched missiles in response to Israeli military actions in Lebanon and Gaza.

The opening discussion focused on U.S. support for Israel in light of these attacks. Walz, representing the Democratic ticket alongside Kamala Harris, emphasized the need for steady leadership. “Israel’s ability to defend itself is absolutely fundamental,” he said, adding that addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza was equally important. Vance, running with Donald Trump, responded by reiterating unwavering support for Israel, emphasizing the right of the country to defend itself against threats.

Both candidates took the opportunity to define their leadership visions. Vance highlighted Trump’s approach to foreign policy, which he described as promoting peace through strength. Walz, on the other hand, argued that Trump’s leadership, particularly his withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), increased global instability by enabling Iran to advance its nuclear ambitions.

Domestic issues also played a key role in the debate. Vance was challenged over his previous controversial comments regarding Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, which led to tensions and bomb threats in the area. He softened his rhetoric during the debate, focusing instead on what he described as the strain that unchecked immigration places on local resources. Walz countered that such statements vilified legally present communities, leading to unnecessary conflict and fear.

On gun violence, the candidates discussed the recent tragic school shooting in Georgia. Vance suggested that increasing school security is the best response, while Walz proposed that some reforms to gun laws could be necessary, though he remained vague about specifics.

Abortion rights were also a flashpoint, with Walz criticizing the Republican Party’s role in overturning Roe v. Wade. Vance, seeking to downplay the controversy, advocated for increased support for families but avoided restating his past support for a nationwide abortion ban.

The debate underscored the key ideological differences between the two candidates and their parties, with both men making their final arguments as Election Day draws near.