Judges are currently reviewing a significant lawsuit against former President Donald Trump, initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The lawsuit alleges that Trump inflated the values of his properties to secure lower interest rates on real estate loans. The case has raised questions regarding its motivation and impact, particularly given James's campaign promises to pursue Trump.
During a recent hearing, members of the five-judge panel expressed skepticism about the merits of James’s case and the penalties imposed by New York Judge Arthur Engoron. Engoron ruled that Trump must pay $355 million in penalties, along with approximately $100 million in interest, a figure that could grow to nearly $500 million during the appeals process. Critics argue that the lawsuit lacks clear victims, noting that the loans were repaid in full and that the lending institutions had conducted their own assessments.
Justice David Friedman highlighted that the suit involves major financial institutions such as Deutsche Bank, indicating that both parties were sophisticated and no financial harm had occurred. Other judges also questioned the proportionality of the penalties in relation to the alleged misconduct. Justice Peter Moulton remarked on the need for limitations on the Attorney General’s authority in private transactions where no harm is claimed.
It remains to be seen whether the original ruling will be upheld, reduced, or dismissed entirely.