Gun ban trial examines features plaintiffs argue aid in self-defense

Sponsored Ad

The recent bench trial on Illinois' gun and magazine ban, Barnett v. Raoul, has concluded, potentially impacting a separate lawsuit about firearm silencers. The trial explored the similarities between banned semi-automatic firearms and military-grade automatic weapons, addressing concerns from the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that supported the state's preliminary stance.

A key issue was the Illinois law banning flash suppressors, which plaintiffs argued improve visibility in self-defense situations. State attorneys contended these features could facilitate shooting in dark environments, such as movie theaters. Lead plaintiff Dane Harrel emphasized their lawful use for homeowners and business owners.

The trial also examined other banned features, including pistol grips, which enhance control and aim, and collapsible stocks for users of varying sizes. The discussion included threaded barrels that can attach suppressors to reduce noise. Judge Stephen McGlynn noted the role of suppressors in helping residents hear intruders.

Gun ban litigants must submit remaining briefs by October 21 before a ruling from Judge McGlynn. The silencer ban case, now with Judge David Dugan, is pending consolidation with similar cases.